ranked.vote // San Francisco Board of Supervisors, District 6

The San Francisco Consolidated General Election was held on November 2, 2010. Jane Kim was the winner out of 14 candidatesafter 11 elimination rounds.

Jane Kim was also the Condorcet winner.

Jane KimDebra WalkerTheresa SparksEliminated in round 11Matt DrakeEliminated in round 10James KeysEliminated in round 10Glendon “Anna Conda” HydeEliminated in round 10Elaine ZamoraEliminated in round 9Dean ClarkEliminated in round 8Jim MekoEliminated in round 7George VazhappallyEliminated in round 6H. BrownEliminated in round 5Matt AsheEliminated in round 4George DavisEliminated in round 3Fortunate “Nate” PayneEliminated in round 2Write-InEliminated in round 1

Runoff Rounds

This Sankey diagram shows the votes of each remaining candidate at each round, as well as the breakdown of votes transferred when each candidate was eliminated.

Note that the tabulation (but not the winner) may differ from the official count. You can read more about why this is.

Round 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7Round 8Round 9Round 10Round 11Round 12Jane KimDebra WalkerTheresa SparksJames KeysMatt DrakeGlendon “Anna Conda” HydeElaine ZamoraDean ClarkJim MekoGeorge VazhappallyMatt AsheH. BrownGeorge DavisFortunate “Nate” PayneWrite-InExhaustedJane KimDebra WalkerExhausted

Pairwise Preferences

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who preferred one to the other. A preference means that either a voter ranks a candidate ahead of the other, or ranks one candidate but does not list the other. Ballots which rank neither candidate are not counted towards the percent counts.

Less-preferred Candidate
Preferred Candidate
Dean Clark
Debra Walker
James Keys
Jane Kim
H. Brown
George Vazhappally
Theresa Sparks
Fortunate “Nate” Payne
Elaine Zamora
Jim Meko
Matt Ashe
Matt Drake
George Davis
Glendon “Anna Conda” Hyde
Write-In
Dean Clark13.7%41.6%11%70.4%73.5%19.1%74.9%44.2%52.2%76.5%44.4%74.9%35.7%96.3%
Debra Walker86.3%82.7%45.9%92.8%93.5%60.8%94.3%83.3%87.7%95.3%82%94.9%83.2%99.4%
James Keys58.4%17.3%15.1%75.9%79.2%25.3%80.5%53%61%82.1%54.5%80.9%44.5%97.3%
Jane Kim89%54.1%84.9%95%95.1%65.9%95.2%88.4%89.5%95.9%86.6%95.5%86.6%99.5%
H. Brown29.6%7.2%24.1%5%55.7%9.9%57.2%26.3%33.7%60.3%28.1%57.3%20.3%92.4%
George Vazhappally26.5%6.5%20.8%4.9%44.3%8.4%53.9%22.6%28.7%54.3%22.2%51.9%17.5%90.6%
Theresa Sparks80.9%39.2%74.7%34.1%90.1%91.6%92.4%78.6%83.3%93.6%79.8%92.6%70.2%99%
Fortunate “Nate” Payne25.1%5.7%19.5%4.8%42.8%46.1%7.6%21.8%27.7%53%20.8%50.6%15.8%90.1%
Elaine Zamora55.8%16.7%47%11.6%73.7%77.4%21.4%78.2%58%80.3%51.3%79.6%41.4%97%
Jim Meko47.8%12.3%39%10.5%66.3%71.3%16.7%72.3%42%75.5%41.8%73.1%33.8%95.9%
Matt Ashe23.5%4.7%17.9%4.1%39.7%45.7%6.4%47%19.7%24.5%20%48.1%14.2%88.9%
Matt Drake55.6%18%45.5%13.4%71.9%77.8%20.2%79.2%48.7%58.2%80%78.1%39.8%96.8%
George Davis25.1%5.1%19.1%4.5%42.7%48.1%7.4%49.4%20.4%26.9%51.9%21.9%15.6%89.8%
Glendon “Anna Conda” Hyde64.3%16.8%55.5%13.4%79.7%82.5%29.8%84.2%58.6%66.2%85.8%60.2%84.4%97.9%
Write-In3.7%0.6%2.7%0.5%7.6%9.4%1%9.9%3%4.1%11.1%3.2%10.2%2.1%

First Alternate

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who ranked one candidate first ranked the other candidate second.

Second Choice
First Choice
Dean Clark
Debra Walker
James Keys
Jane Kim
H. Brown
George Vazhappally
Theresa Sparks
Fortunate “Nate” Payne
Elaine Zamora
Jim Meko
Matt Ashe
Matt Drake
George Davis
Glendon “Anna Conda” Hyde
Write-In
Exhausted
Dean Clark20.4%8%14.3%6.5%4.7%7%2.3%3%1.5%1.2%5.6%1.2%2.2%0.2%22.1%
Debra Walker2.8%5.4%36.8%1.1%0.4%13.2%0.6%3.2%2.9%0.7%0.9%0.8%5%0.2%25.8%
James Keys3.1%21.8%25.2%1%0.9%10.8%0.9%2.5%4.1%0.3%1.4%1.3%4.5%0.1%22.1%
Jane Kim3.1%22.2%4.5%2.2%0.8%15.3%0.6%5.8%2.4%0.8%3.8%0.8%6.9%0.1%30.8%
H. Brown15.4%8.8%6.6%12.1%3.3%6%1.6%7.1%5.5%2.7%3.8%2.7%3.3%0.5%20.3%
George Vazhappally6.2%4.5%1.7%8.3%2.5%5.4%23.6%6.2%9.5%1.2%10.3%2.1%1.7%16.9%
Theresa Sparks2%16%3.7%21.4%1.3%0.9%1%4.2%4%0.9%8.7%0.9%4.6%0.1%30.2%
Fortunate “Nate” Payne6.7%12.7%4%8%2.7%12.7%4%2%8.7%1.3%5.3%1.3%10.7%0.7%19.3%
Elaine Zamora4.1%12.9%5.7%16.8%1.9%1.4%12.4%1.1%3%1.3%7.5%2.7%3.6%0.2%25.6%
Jim Meko1.7%16.7%9.3%17%0.7%4.2%9.3%3.2%3.2%2.5%6.1%2.7%3.9%0.2%19.2%
Matt Ashe3.2%13%2.2%14.6%2.2%1.6%9.2%1.1%4.3%5.4%12.4%7%8.1%0.5%15.1%
Matt Drake7.9%5.9%1.4%16.3%0.5%4.5%14.7%4.8%7.3%9.6%2.1%2%1.8%0.1%21.1%
George Davis7%16.5%5.1%7%7%5.1%5.7%2.5%5.7%2.5%1.9%4.4%8.2%21.5%
Glendon “Anna Conda” Hyde2.7%27.5%6.4%18.2%2.5%0.7%10.7%3.9%2.9%3.2%1.6%1.7%2.6%0.3%15.2%
Write-In3.4%6.9%3.4%3.4%82.8%

Ranking Distribution

This shows how many candidates voters ranked, both overall and broken down by each candidate's first-choice supporters. This reveals whether some candidates attracted voters who ranked multiple candidates versus those who ranked fewer candidates.

Number of Candidates Ranked
Candidate
1
2
3
All Candidates
(21,086 voters)
26.9%12.8%60.3%
Jane Kim
(6,621 voters)
30.8%12.7%56.5%
Debra Walker
(5,669 voters)
25.8%12.6%61.5%
Theresa Sparks
(3,605 voters)
30.2%15.9%53.9%
James Keys
(960 voters)
22.1%10.4%67.5%
Matt Drake
(947 voters)
21.1%16.5%62.4%
Glendon “Anna Conda” Hyde
(692 voters)
15.2%9.7%75.1%
Elaine Zamora
(637 voters)
25.6%8.5%65.9%
Dean Clark
(602 voters)
22.1%8.3%69.6%
Jim Meko
(407 voters)
19.2%10.8%70.0%
George Vazhappally
(242 voters)
16.9%12.0%71.1%
Matt Ashe
(185 voters)
15.1%7.6%77.3%
H. Brown
(182 voters)
20.3%11.0%68.7%
George Davis
(158 voters)
21.5%12.0%66.5%
Fortunate “Nate” Payne
(150 voters)
19.3%7.3%73.3%
Write-In
(29 voters)
82.8%3.4%13.8%

Final Vote by First Choice

This table tracks which candidate ballots were ultimately allocated to, among ballots that ranked an eliminated candidate first.

Final Round Choice
First Round Choice
Debra Walker
Jane Kim
Exhausted
Dean Clark24.9%20.3%54.8%
James Keys26.9%30.2%42.9%
H. Brown14.8%20.3%64.8%
George Vazhappally8.3%12%79.8%
Theresa Sparks20.4%27.5%52.1%
Fortunate “Nate” Payne20.7%13.3%66%
Elaine Zamora17.3%25.7%57%
Jim Meko26.5%24.8%48.6%
Matt Ashe18.9%21.1%60%
Matt Drake9.5%27%63.5%
George Davis23.4%11.4%65.2%
Glendon “Anna Conda” Hyde37.1%25.1%37.7%
Write-In3.4%6.9%89.7%

This report was generated by ranked.vote and may be reproduced under CC-BY. Learn more about ranked.vote.

card