ranked.vote // San Francisco Board of Supervisors, District 5
The San Francisco Consolidated General Election was held on November 6, 2012. London Breed was the winner out of 8 candidatesafter 4 elimination rounds.
London Breed was also the Condorcet winner.
Runoff Rounds
This Sankey diagram shows the votes of each remaining candidate at each round, as well as the breakdown of votes transferred when each candidate was eliminated.
Note that the tabulation (but not the winner) may differ from the official count. You can read more about why this is.
Pairwise Preferences
For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who preferred one to the other. A preference means that either a voter ranks a candidate ahead of the other, or ranks one candidate but does not list the other. Ballots which rank neither candidate are not counted towards the percent counts.
| Less-preferred Candidate | |||||||||
Preferred Candidate | Christina Olague | Thea Selby | Julian Davis | John Rizzo | Andrew “Ellard” Resignato | Hope Johnson | Daniel Everett | London Breed | |
| Christina Olague | 52.2% | 53.2% | 51.9% | 83.3% | 86% | 78.7% | 43.8% | ||
| Thea Selby | 47.8% | 50.5% | 45.6% | 83.3% | 86.2% | 77.7% | 41.6% | ||
| Julian Davis | 46.8% | 49.5% | 48.6% | 82.4% | 84.7% | 77.3% | 40.1% | ||
| John Rizzo | 48.1% | 54.4% | 51.4% | 83.4% | 85.1% | 78.8% | 42.5% | ||
| Andrew “Ellard” Resignato | 16.7% | 16.7% | 17.6% | 16.6% | 54% | 41.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Hope Johnson | 14% | 13.8% | 15.3% | 14.9% | 46% | 37.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Daniel Everett | 21.3% | 22.3% | 22.7% | 21.2% | 58.3% | 62.1% | 17.5% | ||
| London Breed | 56.2% | 58.4% | 59.9% | 57.5% | 87.5% | 89.3% | 82.5% | ||
First Alternate
For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who ranked one candidate first ranked the other candidate second.
| Second Choice | ||||||||||
First Choice | Christina Olague | Thea Selby | Julian Davis | John Rizzo | Andrew “Ellard” Resignato | Hope Johnson | Daniel Everett | London Breed | Exhausted | |
| Christina Olague | 13% | 19.1% | 19.7% | 2.4% | 2.5% | 3.9% | 20.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Thea Selby | 11.9% | 12.6% | 23% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 5.2% | 21.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Julian Davis | 22.6% | 12.3% | 22% | 3.5% | 3% | 5.1% | 18% | 13.5% | ||
| John Rizzo | 14.5% | 39.5% | 15.6% | 2.5% | 1.5% | 4.8% | 11.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Andrew “Ellard” Resignato | 8.4% | 16.4% | 13.8% | 12.9% | 7.8% | 7.8% | 21.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Hope Johnson | 10.8% | 21% | 12% | 11% | 10% | 11.6% | 12% | 11.4% | ||
| Daniel Everett | 13.9% | 12% | 14.6% | 14.8% | 5.2% | 4.8% | 17.9% | 16.8% | ||
| London Breed | 17.3% | 16.8% | 15.7% | 13.2% | 4.1% | 2.9% | 4.4% | 25.7% | ||
Ranking Distribution
This shows how many candidates voters ranked, both overall and broken down by each candidate's first-choice supporters. This reveals whether some candidates attracted voters who ranked multiple candidates versus those who ranked fewer candidates.
| Number of Candidates Ranked | ||||
Candidate | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| All Candidates (35,147 voters) | 17.7% | 15.0% | 67.3% | |
| London Breed (9,842 voters) | 25.7% | 13.2% | 61.1% | |
| Christina Olague (6,955 voters) | 18.7% | 12.7% | 68.6% | |
| John Rizzo (5,683 voters) | 10.1% | 23.2% | 66.7% | |
| Julian Davis (5,342 voters) | 13.5% | 14.4% | 72.1% | |
| Thea Selby (4,738 voters) | 15.5% | 15.8% | 68.7% | |
| Daniel Everett (1,315 voters) | 16.8% | 10.0% | 73.2% | |
| Andrew “Ellard” Resignato (782 voters) | 11.3% | 10.4% | 78.4% | |
| Hope Johnson (490 voters) | 11.4% | 9.8% | 78.8% | |
Final Vote by First Choice
This table tracks which candidate ballots were ultimately allocated to, among ballots that ranked an eliminated candidate first.
| Final Round Choice | ||||
First Round Choice | Christina Olague | London Breed | Exhausted | |
| Thea Selby | 19.7% | 33.7% | 46.6% | |
| Julian Davis | 32.4% | 26.7% | 40.9% | |
| John Rizzo | 27% | 23.5% | 49.5% | |
| Andrew “Ellard” Resignato | 17.8% | 35.4% | 46.8% | |
| Hope Johnson | 20.2% | 23.5% | 56.3% | |
| Daniel Everett | 20.7% | 26.9% | 52.4% | |
This report was generated by ranked.vote and may be reproduced under CC-BY. Learn more about ranked.vote.